For background on the case, click here.
the big event of the day came when Rowling took the stand, dressed not unlike her lawyers, in a black suit with white pinstripes. In direct examination, Cendali began by asking Rowling about the initial creation of the Potter franchise and the well-reported finanical hardship that attended it.
“I don’t want to cry, because I’m British,” said Rowling, breaking down a bit, “but the [Harry Potter books] meant setting aside my children.” If that was a show of weakness on Rowling’s part, to the Law Blog’s sensibilities, it was effective in making her seem sympathetic. It was also a counterpoint to testimony that was otherwise declarative and authoritative.
“Should my fans be flooded with a surfeit of substandard books — so called lexicons — I’m not sure I’d have the will or heart to continue,” said Rowling, who went on to characterize the H.P. Lexicon as “sloppy,” “lazy,” and “incorrect.”
No comments:
Post a Comment